USPTO serial 76693462
TOTE - A - TOT - POT POTTIE CHAIR TOTE BAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOTE - A - TOT - POT POTTIE CHAIR TOTE BAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ORLAND PARK, IL
ORLAND PARK, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Potty chairs in the nature of children's portable toilets; tote bags specially fitted to carry portable toilets, with additional space for toilet training accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2012 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |