USPTO serial 76693497
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Kitchen utensils and containers, namely, tea kettles, whistling and non-whistling tea kettle, cookware sets consisting of pots, pans, stock pots, colanders, mixing bowls, serving trays not of precious metals, roasting pans, lasagna pans, cups, salt and pepper shakers, household containers for foods, namely, grated cheese containers, spoon rests, trivets, napkin holders, Cookware, namely, steamers, double boilers, and pasta steamers, spice racks, paper towel holders, baskets made of wicker, straw, wood and/or cloth to hold fruit, bread baskets made of wicker, straw, wood and/or cloth, pet bowls, cocktail shakers, liquor bar sets comprised of cocktail shaker, beverage glasses, water pitchers, fondue sets comprised of fondue pot, fondue bowls, two tier serving trays not of precious metals, wine coolers, home kitchen tool sets consisting of serving spoons and spatulas, grated cheese makers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2009 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |