USPTO serial 76693552
YR20
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3812374Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 6, 2010
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with YR20?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason Celaya
JASON CELAYA The Matthews Firm2000 BERING DR STE 700HOUSTON, TX 77057-3776UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and computer hardware for network testing, network analysis, and network reliability assurance | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2005 |
| 042 | On-demand network solutions, namely, design and development of networks; analysis and testing of computer networks, including performing complex computer network analyses, computer software analysis, namely, performing analyses of software applications on a network, namely, software applications on the network that is capable of producing human readable output in the form of network charts, network graphs, network video displays, words presented on paper on the network, network web browsers, and other network presentation technology; management of computer networks for others and long-term remote computer network technical monitoring; optimization of computer networks, namely, maintenance and repair of computer networks; computer network management services, namely, computer network testing for others, computer network analysis for others, computer network software applications analysis for others, managing computer networks for others, network reliability assurance in the nature of monitoring network reliability, and optimizing computer networks, namely, maintenance and repair of computer networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |