USPTO serial 76693685
LUNCH 'N LEARN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3610542Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 21, 2009
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LUNCH 'N LEARN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myron Amer
PALGON, MONELLE28 Gilchrest Road, Apt. 3JGreat Neck, NY 11021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Children's lunch bags for containing food to be eaten as lunch at school, sold empty | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 27, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PALGON, MONELLE
- Other trademarks owned by PALGON, MONELLE
- Other trademarks owned by WARHIT, HELENE
- Other trademarks owned by WARHIT, HELENE
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named LUNCH 'N LEARN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 24, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |