USPTO serial 76693768
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Tidman
MARK TIDMAN Kelu Lu of Baker & Hostetler LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5318UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | museum services | ACTIVE | Jul 13, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |