USPTO serial 76693895
AXA AXA EQUITABLE REDEFINING/STANDARDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AXA AXA EQUITABLE REDEFINING/STANDARDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75008 Paris, FR
75008 Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Lieberman
Steven Lieberman Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc1425 K Street NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Cash flow services, namely, providing cash to mortgage or note holders in return for ownership of the mortgage or note | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing online information in the field of entertainment, namely, musical performances, musical videos, film clips, photographs and other multimedia materials; entertainment services, namely, providing information regarding online reviews, recommendations, and rankings relating to events in the fields of education, lifestyle, and sports all exclusively for non-business and non-commercial transactions and purposes; entertainment services, namely, providing online information relating to events in the fields of education, lifestyle, and sports all exclusively for non-business and non-commercial transactions and purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |