USPTO serial 76694019
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Carmel Valley, CA
Carmel Valley, CA
Carmel Valley, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Hale
JOHN S. HALE GIPPLE & HALE6718 Whittier Avenue, Suite 200McLean, VA 22101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine, namely, cabernet sauvignon wine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 24, 2008 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 7, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |