USPTO serial 76694069
CLING TIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 17, 2009
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLING TIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Miller Chemical & Fertilizer Corporation
Hanover, PA
Other trademarks owned by Miller Chemical & Fertilizer Corporation
Miller Chemical & Fertilizer Corporation
Hanover, PA
Other trademarks owned by Miller Chemical & Fertilizer Corporation
Miller Chemical & Fertilizer Corporation
Hanover, PA
Other trademarks owned by Miller Chemical & Fertilizer Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley B. Kita
STANLEY B. KITA Howson & Howson LLP501 OFFICE CENTER DR STE 210FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034-3224UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical adjuvants for use in agriculture, horticulture and forestry to enhance the deposition and retention of fungicides, herbicides, insecticides and parasiticides on plant surfaces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Miller Chemical & Fertilizer Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Miller Chemical & Fertilizer Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Miller Chemical & Fertilizer Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named CLING TIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |