USPTO serial 76694234
CM MANDELL'S MIRACLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CM MANDELL'S MIRACLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | LEATHER GOODS, CLOTH GOODS, WALL CCL HANGINGS, BOOKS, JEWELRY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2011 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2009 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2009 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2009 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |