Drawing for VITAL DATA TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 76694556

VITAL DATA TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4047273Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 1, 2011
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VITAL DATA TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher A. Wilson

Christopher A. Wilson, Wilson & Oskam, LLP9110 Irvine Center DriveIRVINE, CA 92618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software to insurance companies and individual consumers, excluding medical and healthcare professionals and educators, for accessing and managing patient medical information, excluding medical imagesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDApr 2, 2005
044Medical assistance services provided to insurance companies and individual consumers, excluding medical and healthcare professionals and educators, in the nature of medical information, excluding medical images, provided from remote locations via the Internet and global computer networks through the use of a data storage and retrieval system; maintaining personal medical history records and files; 24-hour response center that provides medical information, excluding medical images, to emergency medical personnel and allows members to update their medical/personal files with the target consumers of these services being insurance companies and individuals, not in their medical professional nor educational capacitiesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDApr 2, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2013C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Dec 14, 2013C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Dec 14, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 4, 2013ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 22, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2011TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Sep 22, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 22, 2011OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 26, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 28, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 7, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 23, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 29, 2009LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Feb 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 4, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance