USPTO serial 76694590
MAGNA E CAR SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAGNA E CAR SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aurora, Ontario L4G 7K1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anessa Owen Kramer
Anessa Kramer Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electric batteries and their parts, namely, battery housings, battery electrolyte, battery terminals, battery electrodes; electric accumulators and their parts, namely, accumulator housings, accumulator electrolyte, accumulator terminals, accumulator electrodes; chargers for electric batteries; solar batteries | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | electric powered land vehicles, namely, buses, automobiles, mopeds, motorcycles, trucks, vans, wheelchairs; parts and components for the aforesaid, namely, motors, engines, power trains, generators, alternators, inverters, cooling systems and control systems; parts and fittings for vehicles, namely, roof rails, roof racks, trailers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | designing and engineering electric buses, automobiles, mopeds, motorcycles, trucks, vans and wheelchairs and components and assemblies therefore | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |