USPTO serial 76694594
THE EMERALD CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3814868Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 6, 2010
- Examiner
- OLANDRIA, WARREN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE EMERALD CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EMERALD CITIES COLLABORATIVE, INC.
WASHINGTON, DC
Other trademarks owned by EMERALD CITIES COLLABORATIVE, INC.
Trinity, FL
Trinity, FL
Trinity, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua W. Newman
Joshua W. Newman Reed Smith, LLP10 South Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business development and formation consulting services for the renewable energy industry | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EMERALD CITIES COLLABORATIVE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Orlando, Perry M.
- Other trademarks owned by Orlando, Perry M.
- Other trademarks owned by Orlando, Perry M.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named THE EMERALD CITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2017 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 15, 2016 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 7, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |