USPTO serial 76694598
MAGLIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAGLIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Woodstock, Ontario, N4T 1P1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary L. Shaffer
GARY L. SHAFFER GARY L. SHAFFER, ESQ. LLC901 BANKS PLALEXANDRIA, VA 22312-5507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | PRODUCTS FOR USE AT OUTDOOR SITES, NAMELY, METAL BICYCLE STORAGE RACKS, METAL BOLLARDS, METAL LEANING RAILS, NON-LUMINOUS AND NON-MECHANICAL METAL SIGNS, AND METAL TREE GRATES AND METAL TREE GUARDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | PUBLIC SITE FURNITURE AND OTHER PRODUCTS FOR USE AT OUTDOOR SITES, NAMELY, OUTDOOR FURNITURE FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USE, OUTDOOR BENCHES, OUTDOOR CHAIRS, OUTDOOR TABLES, FOOD COURT FURNITURE, AND SHOPPING CENTER FURNITURE; NONMETAL PRODUCTS FOR USE AT OUTDOOR SITES, NAMELY, RECYCLING TRASH CONTAINERS, WASTE RECEPTACLES AND RECYCLING RECEPTACLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | PLANTERS FOR FLOWERS AND PLANTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |