USPTO serial 76694652
KLEEMANN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4092631Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 31, 2012
- Examiner
- COLLIER, DAVID E
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KLEEMANN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goppingen-Faurndau, DE
Goppingen-Faurndau, DE
Göppingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott M. Douglass
Scott M. Douglass Patterson Intellectual Property Law, P.C.1600 Division Street, Suite 500Nashville, TN 37203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Construction machines, winning machines and processing machines and apparatus and their tools, other than hand-operated tools, in particular raw and recoverable material processing, winning and construction machines in the nature of [ impact waste crushers, ] jaw waste crushers, cone waste crushers, [ vibrating screen separators, wobbler feeders for feeding raw and recoverable material, reciprocating feeders for feeding raw and recoverable material, apron plate feeders in the nature of conveyors, conveyors, loading equipment, not for household purposes, in the nature of loading machines for breaking, sieving, separating, classifying, washing and transporting raw materials and recoverable materials, ] as well as replacement parts sold as an integral component therewith, specifically, [ drive elements in the nature of variable speed drives for use with the feeders, ] high-performance tools being machine parts of hard metal, namely, machine parts in the nature of [ saw blades, ] tool bits [, milling cutters for construction machines, winning machines and processing machines, milling machines, grinding machines, and sieves for use in separating raw materials and recoverable materials ] and replacement parts sold as an integral component therewith, all of which form stationary and/or semi-mobile processing plants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | [ Rental of machines and apparatus, namely, impact waste crushers, jaw waste crushers, cone waste crushers, vibrating screen separators, wobbler feeders, reciprocating feeders, apron plate feeders in the nature of conveyors, conveyors, loading machines for breaking, sieving, separating, classifying, washing and transporting raw materials and recoverable materials; servicing, maintenance and repair of vehicles and machines, namely, impact waste crushers, jaw waste crushers, cone waste crushers, vibrating screen separators, wobbler feeders, reciprocating feeders, apron plate feeders in the nature of conveyors, conveyors, loading machines for breaking, sieving, separating, classifying, washing and transporting raw materials and recoverable materials; technical consultation regarding maintenance of vehicles, machines and apparatus for processing of raw materials and recoverable materials, as well as their wear parts and spare parts ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | [ Material treatment services in connection with recycling, namely, treatment and recycling of raw materials and recoverable materials in the nature of natural stone, concrete, asphalt; technical consultation in the field of materials processing of raw materials and recoverable materials ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Technical planning of projects concerning the processing of raw materials and recoverable materials ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kleemann GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kleemann GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kleemann GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named KLEEMANN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |