USPTO serial 76694653
IBT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 2, 2010
- Examiner
- OLANDRIA, WARREN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IBT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lee's Summit, MO
Progene Biomedical, Incorporated
Lenexa, KS
Progene Biomedical, Incorporated
Lenexa, KS
Progene Biomedical, Incorporated
Lenexa, KS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Irene Treloar
Irene Treloar Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP1133 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ViraCor-IBT Laboratories, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Progene Biomedical, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Progene Biomedical, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Progene Biomedical, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named IBT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |