USPTO serial 76694736
APPLIED ERGONOMICS CONFERENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 22, 2011
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with APPLIED ERGONOMICS CONFERENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERS, INC.
NORCROSS, PA
Other trademarks owned by INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERS, INC.
Institute of Industrial Engineers, Inc.
Norcross, GA
Other trademarks owned by Institute of Industrial Engineers, Inc.
Institute of Industrial Engineers, Inc.
Norcross, GA
Other trademarks owned by Institute of Industrial Engineers, Inc.
Institute of Industrial Engineers, Inc.
Norcross, GA
Other trademarks owned by Institute of Industrial Engineers, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barth Xavier deRosa
Barth Xavier deRosa Moser Taboada1040 Broad St., Suite 1031040 Broad Street, Suite 103Shrewsbury, NJ 31405Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Publications, namely, brochures, pamphlets and course materials in the field of industrial engineering, ergonomics and human factor design | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Association services, namely, promoting the interest of members involved in the field of industrial engineering, ergonomics and human factor design; organizing business competitions; arranging and conducting exhibitions for business purposes in the field of industrial engineering, ergonomics and human factor design | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, organizing and conducting student competitions in the field of industrial engineering, ergonomics and human factor design; arranging and conducting educational conferences, educational programs and educational exhibitions in the field of industrial engineering, ergonomics and human factor design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Institute of Industrial Engineers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Institute of Industrial Engineers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Institute of Industrial Engineers, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named APPLIED ERGONOMICS CONFERENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 9, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 9, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |