USPTO serial 76694758
TASTLÉ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 5, 2010
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with TASTLÉ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leonid Mikityanskiy, Esq.
Leonid Mikityanskiy, Esq. Law Offices of Leo Mikityanskiy, P.C.1517 Voorhies AvenueBrooklyn, NY 11235UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Tea; rice; cookies; breakfast cereal; crackers; pastas; mayonnaise; coffee | ACTIVE | Dec 10, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 10, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 26, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2010 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2010 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | ISIC | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - INCOMING CORR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | EARS | EARLY STATEMENT OF USE NOT PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |