USPTO serial 76694856
TLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary L. Shaffer
GARY L. SHAFFER Gary L. Shaffer, Esq. LLC901 BANKS PLALEXANDRIA, VA 22312-5507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | INBOUND AND OUTBOUND CALL CENTER OPERATION SERVICES ON BEHALF OF OTHERS, CUSTOMER SUPPORT SERVICES, CENTRAL TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES, TELEPHONE OPERATOR SERVICES, MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES INCLUDING CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEYS, CONSUMER RESEARCH, AND TELEMARKETING, CONDUCTING MARKET RESEARCH, CONDUCTING MARKET OPINION POLLING STUDIES, BUSINESS MARKETING SERVICES, AND CONDUCTING MARKETING STUDIES ON BEHALF | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |