USPTO serial 76694862
FLUSHABLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLUSHABLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FT. COLLINS, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul R. Martin
730 GLACIER WAYFAIRFIELD, CA 94534-4025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Baby wipes that are in a roll form and are stored in covers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2011 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |