USPTO serial 76694874
GREENLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREENLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TOD R. NISSLE
TOD R. NISSLE TOD R. NISSLE, P.C.PO BOX 55630PHOENIX, AZ 85078-5630UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL SERVICES; ADVERTISING SERVICES; ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY DISPLAYING CONTENT VIA A GLOBAL COMMUNICATION NETWORK AND OTHER FORMS OF A COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY ON DISPLAY SCREENS, CELL PHONES, COMPUTERS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DEVICES PRIMARILY IN PUBLIC PLACES OR BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS; ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROMOTING AND MARKETING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH ALL PUBLIC COMMUNICATION MEANS PRIMARILY IN PUBLIC SPACES AND BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELEVISION BROADCASTING SERVICES; BROADCASTING SERVICES, NAMELY, BROADCASTING DATA, VOICE AND IMAGES CONCERNING ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND ALTERNATIVE ENERGY ISSUES BY TELEVISION VIDEO AND GLOBAL COMMUNICATION NETWORK AND OTHER FORMS OF COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY ON DISPLAY SCREENS, CELL PHONES, COMPUTERS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DEVICES PRIMARILY IN PUBLIC PLACES OR BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | TELEVISION PROGRAMMING; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, A CONTINUING PROGRAM CONCERNING ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND ALTERNATIVE ENERGY ISSUES ACCESSIBLE BY RADIO, TELEVISION, SATELLITE, AUDIO, VIDEO AND COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DYNATEK MEDIA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DYNATEK MEDIA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GREENLINK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 30, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |