USPTO serial 76694975
GOLDEN DARBAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOLDEN DARBAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James T. Nikolai
JAMES T. NIKOLAI NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU, P.A.900 2ND AVE S STE 820MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3325UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Wheat flour, namely, atta flour | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |