USPTO serial 76695156
DEMAYO UNIVERSAL DISTRACTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3674664Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 25, 2009
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DEMAYO UNIVERSAL DISTRACTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INNOVATIVE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
PLAINVILLE, CT
INNOVATIVE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Plainville, CT
INNOVATIVE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Plainville, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Damian Wasserbauer
DAMIAN WASSERBAUER WASSERBAUER LAW LLCPO Box 382Collinsville, CT 06022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical equipment, namely, surgical support unit for positioning the knee or hip for use in surgery | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INNOVATIVE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INNOVATIVE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INNOVATIVE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named DEMAYO UNIVERSAL DISTRACTOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |