Drawing for OMNIPULSE DDC

USPTO serial 76695167

OMNIPULSE DDC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with OMNIPULSE DDC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Patterson

MARK J. PATTERSON WADDEY & PATTERSON, P.C.ROUNDABOUT PLAZA, 1600 DIVISION STREETSUITE 500NASHVILLE, TN 37203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic controllers for crane and hoist motors; electronic controllers for use with power converters; electronic motor switches for switching motors on and offABANDONEDAug 14, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 27, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 27, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 27, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 28, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 5, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 15, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 28, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 13, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance