Drawing for TIDY KIDZ

USPTO serial 76695290

TIDY KIDZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HSU, FONG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIDY KIDZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward D. Lanquist, Jr.

EDWARD D. LANQUIST, JR. WADDEY & PATTERSON, P.C.1600 DIVISION ST STE 500NASHVILLE, TN 37203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded audio and video tapes, cassettes, and disks, featuring stories to help kids be organizedACTIVE—
016Books featuring stories to help kids be organizedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 8, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 3, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 7, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 4, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 4, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 16, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 17, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2009CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 31, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 31, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 22, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance