USPTO serial 76695305
GIGMVM GOD IS GOOD MYRLANDE VOLMAR MINISTRIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIGMVM GOD IS GOOD MYRLANDE VOLMAR MINISTRIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Charitable services, namely, organizing and conducting volunteer programs; accounting services; charitable services, namely, coordination of the procurement and distribution of food donations to needy persons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by God Is Good Myrlande Volmar Ministries, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by God Is Good Myrlande Volmar Ministries, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named GIGMVM GOD IS GOOD MYRLANDE VOLMAR MINISTRIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 31, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2009 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |