USPTO serial 76695341
DIGITAL SPA FROG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIGITAL SPA FROG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas N. Phung
THOMAS N. PHUNG JACOBSON AND JOHNSONONE WEST WATER STREET, STE 285SAINT PAUL, MN 55107-2080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | equipment for dispensing water purification materials, namely, controller for dispensing water purification materials for swimming pools, spas, hot tubs, whirlpools, and other recreational bodies of water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |