Drawing for SENSITIVITY AWARENESS

USPTO serial 76695362

SENSITIVITY AWARENESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSITIVITY AWARENESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER Myron Amer, P.C.350 NATIONAL BLVD STE 2BLONG BEACH, NY 11561-3327UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Fund raising and educational seminarsACTIVEMay 29, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 12, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 13, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 30, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 9, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 14, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2009AAUDAMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED—
Aug 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2009AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 14, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 13, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance