USPTO serial 76695388
Serial No. 76695388
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2011
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 76695388?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Air Travel Video Technologies, LLC
Santa Barbara, CA
Other trademarks owned by Air Travel Video Technologies, LLC
Air Travel Video Technologies, LLC
Santa Barbara, CA
Other trademarks owned by Air Travel Video Technologies, LLC
Air Travel Video Technologies, LLC
Rye, NH
Other trademarks owned by Air Travel Video Technologies, LLC
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Internet streaming videos, namely, streaming of videos on the Internet relating to and on behalf of airports and airlines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2008 |
| 042 | Non-downloadable web-based software provided via a global information network which provides an architectural based 3-D animation created to convey airport information for use by airports and airport users, namely, airlines, airport tenants and air passengers; creating computer animation and graphic design all relating to and on behalf of airports and airlines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Air Travel Video Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Air Travel Video Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Air Travel Video Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 13, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2009 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |