USPTO serial 76695513
TELE-POSTAL CARRIER SERVICE INC. ALASKAHELENA HAWAII CHICAGO HOUSTON NEW YORK TOKYO, JAPAN MIAMI COMPUTER MALL LOS ANGELES, CA LOCAL RETAIL ZIP CODE COMMUNITY LOCAL RETAIL CODE COMMUNITY CONTACT US WE SHOP PACK SHIP PICK UP AND LOCAL DELIVERY SAME DAY DEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3930345Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 15, 2011
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TELE-POSTAL CARRIER SERVICE INC. ALASKAHELENA HAWAII CHICAGO HOUSTON NEW YORK TOKYO, JAPAN MIAMI COMPUTER MALL LOS ANGELES, CA LOCAL RETAIL ZIP CODE COMMUNITY LOCAL RETAIL CODE COMMUNITY CONTACT US WE SHOP PACK SHIP PICK UP AND LOCAL DELIVERY SAME DAY DEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TELE-POSTAL CARRIER SERVICE INC.
Biloxi, MS
TELE-POSTAL CARRIER SERVICE INC.
Biloxi, MS
TELE-POSTAL CARRIER SERVICE INC.
Biloxi, MS
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and software to expedite the process of delivering goods to the point of destination; Design and development of computer networking hardware and software that connects businesses nationwide and worldwide to expedite the delivery of goods to the point of destination | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELE-POSTAL CARRIER SERVICE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TELE-POSTAL CARRIER SERVICE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TELE-POSTAL CARRIER SERVICE INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TELE-POSTAL CARRIER SERVICE INC. ALASKAHELENA HAWAII CHICAGO HOUSTON NEW YORK TOKYO, JAPAN MIAMI COMPUTER MALL LOS ANGELES, CA LOCAL RETAIL ZIP CODE COMMUNITY LOCAL RETAIL CODE COMMUNITY CONTACT US WE SHOP PACK SHIP PICK UP AND LOCAL DELIVERY SAME DAY DEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2017 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 28, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | PBTQ | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |