USPTO serial 76695516
ARK FLOORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARK FLOORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
El Monte, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID S. W. FANG
DAVID S. W. FANG LAW OFFICES OF DAVID S. W. FANG17800 CASTLETON STREET, SUITE 168UNION BANK BUILDINGCITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Building materials, namely, wooden boards; floor boards; floor panels; floor tiles of wood; non-metal floors; wood tile floors; wooden flooring | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |