USPTO serial 76695517
SAFE. SOUND. SECURE.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAFE. SOUND. SECURE.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Levy
MARK LEVY HINMAN, HOWARD & KATTELL80 EXCHANGE STREETP.O. BOX 5250BINGHAMTON, NY 13901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | banking services; financial services, namely, commercial and small business banking, trust and investment services, financial consulting, retirement plan administration and cash management services | ACTIVE | Sep 24, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 4, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |