Drawing for J+J INVISION UNCOMPROMISING

USPTO serial 76695599

J+J INVISION UNCOMPROMISING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with J+J INVISION UNCOMPROMISING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn A. Tyler

Kathryn A. Tyler Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP221 North Figueroa StreetSuite 1200Los Angeles, CA 90012

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
027carpetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 24, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 23, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance