USPTO serial 76695871
SANUK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3851916Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 2010
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SANUK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Siegmar Silber
SIEGMAR SILBER SILBER & FRIDMAN1037 ROUTE 46 EAST STE 207CLIFTON, NJ 07013-2459UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | alcoholic aperitif bitters; alcoholic beverages except beers; alcoholic beverages of fruit; alcoholic bitters; alcoholic tea-based beverage; anisette; aperitif wines; aperitifs; aperitifs with a distilled alcoholic liquor base; brandy spirits; coffee-based liqueurs; cognac; cooking wine; cordials; cream liqueurs; distilled spirits of rice; fruit wine; hard cider; herb liqueurs; Japanese regenerated liquors (naoshi); Japanese sweet rice-based mixed liquor (shiro-zake); Japanese white liquor (shochu); liqueurs; liquor and liqueur beverages, namely, lao kao; sake; saki; natural sparkling wines; prepared alcoholic cocktail; prepared wine cocktails; red wine; rum; sparkling wines; spirits and liqueurs; sweet wines; table wines; vermouth; vodka; whiskey; white wine; wine; wine coolers; and, wine punches | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |