USPTO serial 76695879
SHARP REMOTE DEVICE MANAGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2011
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SHARP REMOTE DEVICE MANAGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
Donna J. Bunton NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.901 N GLEBE RD STE 1100ARLINGTON, VA 22203-4184UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Copying machines, printers, facsimile machines, scanners, and a combination of the aforementioned products | ACTIVE | Dec 17, 2010 |
| 037 | Maintenance and updating of computer hardware through computer networks for copying machines, printers, facsimile machines, scanners, and the combination of the aforementioned products | ACTIVE | Dec 17, 2010 |
| 042 | Monitoring computer networks for copying machines, printers, facsimile machines, scanners and the combination of the aforementioned products, namely, computer monitoring service which tracks hardware performance and processes and sends out historical reports and alerts; providing computer programming through computer networks for copying machines, printers, facsimile machines, scanners and the combination of the aforementioned products | ACTIVE | Dec 17, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SHARP REMOTE DEVICE MANAGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 6, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 6, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 29, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |