USPTO serial 76695945
DIRTGIRLWORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIRTGIRLWORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq. Kenyon & Kenyon LLPOne BroadwayNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, namely, infant toys, bubble making wands and solution sets, push toys, pull toys, toy blocks and accessories therefore, bean bag toys and electronic bean bag toys; toy building blocks, toy villages, toy scenery sets, doll houses, indoor children's play houses; toy furniture, toy action figures, educational toys, namely, shape sorters and stacking rings designed to teach color and sound recognition, role playing games; bath toys, namely, bath toy squirters, water squirting toys, plush dolls for use in water, scenery sets that connect to the side of a tub or float; foam shapes for teaching numbers, and letters; pool toys, namely, rafts, water rings, and kickboard flotation devices; molded toy figures; beach toys, namely, pails, shovels, rakes, sifters; play swimming pools; musical and sound making toys, namely, toy musical instruments and musical toys; talking toys, namely, talking dolls; plush toys, musical plush toys, and electronic plush toys; plastic activity toys in the shape of household items, namely, plastic toy appliances and toy plastic food; games, namely, board games, card games, dice games and word games; travel games comprised of dice, cards, a playing surface, timer, and/or score card; action skill games; dolls, puppets, toy figurines, bendable toy figurines; clothing for dolls and toy figurines; jigsaw puzzles in two or three dimensions; toy balloons; play tents; handheld units for playing educational electronic games; toy razors; children's hobby craft kits for use in gardening, sewing and/or artwork; toy vehicles for land, sea, air and space, both mechanical, electronic or battery powered; children's ride-on toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |