USPTO serial 76695946
DIRTGIRLWORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIRTGIRLWORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq. Kenyon & Kenyon LLPOne BroadwayNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing and accessories for infants, toddlers, and children, namely, overalls, creeper dresses, dresses, sundresses, dress sets comprised of dresses with a top, sweater, cardigan; or jacket; coordinate pants and shirts; play sets comprised of tops with shorts, pants, overalls, or shortalls knit sets comprised of tops with pants or shorts; shortalls, rompers, jumpers, jog sets comprised of sweat suits, sweatpants with sweatshirts; layettes, namely, sets comprising socks, washcloths, bibs and hooded towels; sets comprising sleepwear, underwear, and playsuits; jumpsuits, swimwear, light weight outerwear, namely, raincoats, hooded and nonhooded jackets, and anoraks; t-shirts, blanket sleeping shirts, dorm shirts, pajamas nightgowns, union suits, jump suits, robes, undergarments, long underwear sets comprised of tops and bottoms, hanging sets comprised of girls' panties with undershirts, boxer shorts, panties; footwear, slippers, sandals, athletic sneakers, plastic sandals, belts, suspenders, mittens, gloves, caps, scarves, socks and hosiery, slipper socks, athletic socks, dress socks, headwear, baseball caps, bucket caps, beanies, headbands, earmuffs, raincoats and slickers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 26, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |