USPTO serial 76695947
DIRTGIRLWORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIRTGIRLWORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq. Kenyon & Kenyon LLPOne BroadwayNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Fiction books based upon an animated television program, bath books and children's story books incorporating a sound feature; flash cards; calendars; party supplies, namely, paper party decorations, paper banners, paper center pieces, paper cake decorations, paper party hats, paper table cloths, printed invitations; school supplies, namely, folders, binders, stencils; pencil and pen boxes, and pen cases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |