USPTO serial 76696032
REVOLUTION E BUILDING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REVOLUTION E BUILDING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Bertin
ROBERT C. BERTIN BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP2020 K STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-1806UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal prefabricated buildings and building modules having rigid, non fabric roofs for renewable energy producing building and energy conservation in buildings, including those for use on swine, dairy and poultry farms; metal prefabricated buildings and building modules having rigid, non fabric roofs including solar photovoltaic and/or solar thermal technologies, and solar roofing and siding elements for electricity, heat, light and/or hot water generation; metal prefabricated buildings and building modules having rigid, non fabric roofs including wind turbines for electricity generation; metal prefabricated buildings and building modules having rigid, non fabric roofs for specific agricultural uses, including dairy production, swine production, and/or poultry production | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Non-metal prefabricated buildings and building modules having rigid, non fabric roofs for renewable energy producing building and energy conservation in buildings, including those for use on swine, dairy and poultry farms; non-metal prefabricated buildings and building having rigid, non fabric roofs modules including solar photovoltaic and/or solar thermal technologies, and solar roofing and siding elements for electricity, heat, light and/or hot water generation; non-metal prefabricated buildings and building modules having rigid, non fabric roofs including wind turbines for electricity generation; non-metal prefabricated buildings and building modules having rigid, non fabric roofs for specific agricultural uses, including dairy production, swine production, and/or poultry production | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |