USPTO serial 76696033
RES AGRICULTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RES AGRICULTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Bertin
ROBERT C BERTIN BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP2020 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-1806UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business organization and operation consultancy for a business which focuses on renewable energy production, the construction, maintenance and repair of power generation facilities, including those for use on swine, dairy and poultry farms and incorporating photovoltaic and/or solar thermal technologies, solar roofing and siding elements, wind turbines and biomass technologies for electricity, heat, light and/or hot water generation; business services, namely, operation of power generation equipment and facilities for others, including those for use on swine, dairy and poultry farms and incorporating photovoltaic and/or solar thermal technologies, solar roofing and siding elements, wind turbines and biomass technologies for electricity, heat, light and/or hot water generation | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Building construction, repair, and maintenance in the field of renewable energy production; construction, maintenance, repair, and installation of power generation facilities, including those for use on swine, dairy and poultry farms and incorporating photovoltaic and/or solar thermal technologies, solar roofing and siding elements, wind turbines and biomass technologies for electricity, heat, light and/or hot water generation | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Generation of power and electricity using renewable energy sources | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |