USPTO serial 76696100
BIO PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLSON, KRISTIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIO PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laval, Québec, H7V 4A7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian J. Winterfeldt
BRIAN J. WINTERFELDT KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP2900 K ST NW - NORTH TWR STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Probiotic body cream for cosmetic purposes only | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Symbiotic, prebiotic and probiotic products, namely, dietary food supplements and dietary nutritionally fortified food products adapted for medical use made of various accepted probiotic strains using milk, soya and rice as carriers; Dietary supplements, namely, lactic ferments and soya ferments for non-medical use; capsules made up of bacteria, namely, various accepted probiotic strains for use as dietary supplements and nutritional supplements; Natural health products, namely, microbiological fermentation extracts using milk, soya or rice as a carrier used for promoting digestive health and wellness; bacteria preparations made up of various accepted strains for medical or veterinary purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Probiotic drinks, namely, probiotic yogurt drinks and probiotic milk; beverages, namely, fermented milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Probiotic energy drinks; probiotic whey beverages; beverages, namely, probiotic lactobacillus acidophilus rice and soya based drinks not for use as a milk substitute | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Organization of ceremonies, shows, conferences and seminars in the field of food and nutrition for commercial, promotional and advertising purposes; promotional services, namely, organization of promotional campaigns for business related to health, food and nutrition | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing a website featuring information on diet and nutrition, including information related to probiotics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bio-K Plus International Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named BIO PLUS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 16, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |