USPTO serial 76696176
LIL WAYNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLSON, KRISTIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIL WAYNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | digital compact video recording discs featuring music | ACTIVE | Sep 27, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2018 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 17, 2010 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 14, 2010 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |