USPTO serial 76696182
HEALTHY ALTERNATIVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEALTHY ALTERNATIVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES FOR DOMESTIC USE, NAMELY, ELECTRIC RICE COOKERS, ELECTRIC DEEP FRYERS, ELECTRIC FRY PANS, ELECTRIC COFFEE URNS, ELECTRIC COFFEE MAKERS, ELECTRIC WATER DISPENSERS, ELECTRIC WATER PURIFIERS, ELECTRIC ROASTER OVENS, ELECTRIC TOASTERS, ELECTRIC TOASTER OVENS, ELECTRIC ICE CREAM MAKERS, ELECTRIC YOGURT MAKERS, ELECTRIC KETTLES, ELECTRIC CITRUS JUICERS, ELECTRIC SLOW COOKERS, ELECTRIC ROTISSERIE/TOASTER OVENS, ELECTRIC PIZZA COOKING OVENS, ELECTRIC CONVECTION OVENS, ELECTRIC MICROWAVE OVENS, ELECTRIC POPCORN MAKERS, ELECTRIC HOT PLATES, ELECTRIC COTTON CANDY MAKERS, ELECTRIC GRILLS, ELECTRIC SKILLETS, ELECTRIC PRESSURE COOKERS, ELECTRIC WOKS, ELECTRIC RICE WARMERS, ELECTRIC FOOD STEAMERS, ELECTRIC SANDWICH MAKERS, ELECTRIC WAFFLE MAKERS, ELECTRIC FOOD DEHYDRATORS, ELECTRIC COFFEE PERCOLATORS, ELECTRIC TEA PERCOLATORS,ELECTRIC TORTILLA MAKERS, ELECTRIC SOUP WARMERS, ELECTRIC TEA MAKERS, ELECTRIC STEW COOKERS, ELECTRIC WATER IONIZERS, ELECTRIC AIR PURIFIERS, ELECTRIC HUMIDIFIERS, ELECTRIC HAIR DRYERS, ELECTRIC WATER FILTERING APPARATUS, ELECTRIC ESPRESSO MACHINE,ELECTRIC CAPUCCINO MAKER, ELECTRIC COFFEE BEAN ROASTER, ELECTRIC BEAN GRINDER, ELECTRIC BAGEL TOASTER,ELECTRIC BREAD BAKING MACHINE, ELECTRIC FOOD WARMER, ELECTRIC OMELET MAKER, ELECTRIC FONDUE POTS WITH HEAT SOURCE, ELECTRIC EGG BOILERS, ELECTRIC INDUCTION COOKER,AND ELECTRIC ESSENTIAL OIL DIFFUSERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |