Drawing for HOD HAND OF DIVINITY

USPTO serial 76696338

HOD HAND OF DIVINITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOD HAND OF DIVINITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Providing of food and drink; providing temporary accommodation, namely, hotel services and boarding houses; travel agency services, namely, making reservations for temporary lodging; travel agency services making reservations for boarding animalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2012PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Feb 2, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 28, 2011PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2011PRRDPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED—
Sep 12, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 6, 2011PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2011PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2011PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 7, 2011CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
May 31, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2011PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 31, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 27, 2011PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 27, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 29, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 22, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 21, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 20, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 20, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 19, 2010CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
May 19, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 18, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 2009AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2009LIECLEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION—
Apr 15, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 14, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2009TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Apr 13, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 23, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance