USPTO serial 76696650
BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY 500
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY 500?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry M. Bissell IV
Henry M. Bissell Bissell Law Office6321 Riggs PlaceLos Angeles, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | MAGAZINES PUBLISHED PERIODICALLY AND PRINTED REPORTS BOTH DEALING WITH BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ADVERTISING AND BUSINESS SERVICES, NAMELY, ARRANGING FOR THE PROMOTION OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND OTHER COMPUTER ONLINE SERVICE PROVIDERS, PROVIDING INFORMATION TO CUSTOMERS IN THE FIELD OF STARTING AND OPERATING SMALL BUSINESSES BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND OTHER COMPUTER ONLINE SERVICE PROVIDERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2015 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | RFRR | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2011 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |