USPTO serial 76696661
FREESTYLIN'
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FREESTYLIN'?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip M. Weiss
Philip M. Weiss LAW OFFICES OF WEISS & WEISS410 Jericho Turnpike, Suite 105Jericho, NY 11753UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Children and youth sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2012 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |