Drawing for UNCOMMON THINKING FOR THE COMMON GOOD

USPTO serial 76696707

UNCOMMON THINKING FOR THE COMMON GOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5018145Status 705Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 9, 2016
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
—

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 705: Status 705 means a Madrid-based U.S. registration has accepted Section 71 maintenance and Section 15 incontestability. The U.S. extension is active with strengthened rights.

Need help with UNCOMMON THINKING FOR THE COMMON GOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,446*

Plus Government fees of $3,400

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephanie A. Gumm

Stephanie A. Gumm Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP300 N. Meridian Street, Suite 2500Indianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic publications, namely, white papers, monographs, guides, periodicals, pamphlets, newsletters, reports, and magazines in the field of information technology used by institutions of higher educationACTIVE—
016[ Printed publications, namely, white papers, monographs, guides, periodicals, pamphlets, newsletters, reports, and magazines, in the field of information technology used by institutions of higher education ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
035Association services, namely, promoting the interests of colleges and universities in using information technology and in using computersACTIVE—
041Conducting conferences and seminars in the field of computer and communication technology, namely, web-based seminars, colloquia, and workshops in the field of information technology used by institutions of higher education; Providing on-line publications, namely, white papers, monographs, guides, journals, periodicals, pamphlets, newsletters, reports, and magazines in the field of information technology used by institutions of higher education; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring information on computers, information technology, and communication technology as used in higher education; Providing continuing education services, namely, providing live and on-line continuing professional education seminars in the field of information technology in higher education; Providing an on-line magazine in the field of information resources management and information technology in higher education; Providing a web site featuring information on higher educationACTIVE—
042Providing information on computer technology, information technology and communications technology in higher education; Providing a web site that features information on computer technology, information technology and communications technology in higher educationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2022NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2022C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 25, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 27, 2022E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2021REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 2, 2016SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2016CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 1, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 25, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 2, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 2, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 7, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 5, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 7, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 3, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 3, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 21, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 5, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 17, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 12, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 7, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 7, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 7, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 6, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 28, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance