USPTO serial 76696707
UNCOMMON THINKING FOR THE COMMON GOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 9, 2016
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- —
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with UNCOMMON THINKING FOR THE COMMON GOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,446*
Plus Government fees of $3,400
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Louisville, CO
Boulder, CO
Boulder, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephanie A. Gumm
Stephanie A. Gumm Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP300 N. Meridian Street, Suite 2500Indianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications, namely, white papers, monographs, guides, periodicals, pamphlets, newsletters, reports, and magazines in the field of information technology used by institutions of higher education | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | [ Printed publications, namely, white papers, monographs, guides, periodicals, pamphlets, newsletters, reports, and magazines, in the field of information technology used by institutions of higher education ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Association services, namely, promoting the interests of colleges and universities in using information technology and in using computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Conducting conferences and seminars in the field of computer and communication technology, namely, web-based seminars, colloquia, and workshops in the field of information technology used by institutions of higher education; Providing on-line publications, namely, white papers, monographs, guides, journals, periodicals, pamphlets, newsletters, reports, and magazines in the field of information technology used by institutions of higher education; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring information on computers, information technology, and communication technology as used in higher education; Providing continuing education services, namely, providing live and on-line continuing professional education seminars in the field of information technology in higher education; Providing an on-line magazine in the field of information resources management and information technology in higher education; Providing a web site featuring information on higher education | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing information on computer technology, information technology and communications technology in higher education; Providing a web site that features information on computer technology, information technology and communications technology in higher education | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EDUCAUSE
- Other trademarks owned by EDUCAUSE
- Other trademarks owned by EDUCAUSE
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named UNCOMMON THINKING FOR THE COMMON GOOD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2022 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2022 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 2, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 25, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 7, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |