USPTO serial 76696833
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Van Bergen
PETER J VAN BERGEN Peter J. Van Bergen402 W DUKE OF GLOUCESTER STWILLIAMSBURG, VA 23185-3660UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Traction apparatus for medical use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 2, 2009 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |