Drawing for STERNALVEST

USPTO serial 76697006

STERNALVEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STERNALVEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David G. Bray

DAVID G BRAY ESQ MARISCAL WEEKS MCINTYRE & FRIEDLANDER PA2901 NORTH CENTRALSUITE 200PHOENIX, AZ 85012-2705

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010THERAPEUTIC THORACIC/ABDOMINAL COMPRESSION VEST USED FOR THE PURPOSES OF STABILIZING, IMMOBILIZING, AND COMPRESSING ANY TYPE OF MEDICAL CONDITION INCLUDING AN OPEN WOUND OR CLOSED MEDICAL CONDITION OR FOR ANY PREOPERATIVE AND/OR POSTOPERATIVE SURGICAL PROCEDUREACTIVEAug 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 7, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 7, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 24, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 10, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 10, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 27, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 25, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 18, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 15, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 1, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance