Drawing for THE GEORGE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM

USPTO serial 76697123

THE GEORGE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE GEORGE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norman H. Zivin

NORMAN H. ZIVIN COOPER & DUNHAM LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-0015UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036CHARITABLE FUND RAISING SERVICESACTIVEOct 21, 2009
041EDUCATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING DISPLAYS AND EXHIBITS IN THE FIELDS OF PROMOTING AWARENESS AND SIGNIFICANCE OF RELIGION FREEDOMACTIVEOct 21, 2009
045PROVIDING A WEB SITE FEATURING INFORMATION THAT RAISES AWARENESS ABOUT THE SIGNIFICANCE OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOMACTIVEOct 21, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 28, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 28, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 27, 2011CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2011CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 30, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 12, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 12, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 25, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 21, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 14, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 2, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 17, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 17, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 4, 2009PBIRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST—
Oct 23, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 23, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 6, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 1, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance