USPTO serial 76697241
NUAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 2015
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with NUAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Mic preamplifiers; ] mixing control surface, namely, electronic sound mixing, processing and synthesizing apparatus; electronic sound mixing consoles, namely, sound mixers, integrated mixers; audio signal processors [ ; sound equalizers; electronic sound effectors, namely, sound signal processors for changing original sound signals; electronic sound effectors for dynamics, namely, sound signal processors that allow users to control or manipulate the volume of sound; electronic sound effectors for musical instruments; interface boxes, namely, electric junction boxes or switch boxes and interface cards for data processing equipment in the form of printed circuits for mutually connecting the aforementioned goods; interface boxes, namely, electric junction boxes or switch boxes and interface cards for data processing equipment in the form of printed circuits for connecting the aforementioned goods with electronic musical instruments; remote controllers for audio and video apparatus; audio interfaces, namely, audio circuit boards; converters, namely, analog-to-digital (AD) audio converters; digital-to-analog audio converters; analog input boxes, namely, electronic apparatus for transmitting analog audio signals to electronic sound mixing apparatus; electronic apparatus for transmitting audio signals between electronic devices over optical and electronic networks; speaker processors, namely, sound signal processors that control speakers; digital audio network interface boxes, namely, electronic apparatus for transmitting audio signals between electronic sound mixing apparatus and musical instruments over a digital audio network; interoperability software for creating and editing music and sounds contained in music and not for use in mobile phones, namely, computer software for mixing audio signals, computer software for reproducing, effecting, and recording sound, computer software for transmitting audio signals, computer software for processing audio signals, computer software for controlling audio apparatus, computer software for routing audio apparatus; electronic circuits for generating, effecting, recording and reproducing sound ] | ACTIVE | Mar 21, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 19, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 19, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 16, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |